Duties and responsibilities

A reviewer in their work should be guided by ethical standards COPE for reviewers.

The reviewer should evaluate only the manuscript (or part of the manuscript), the subject of which corresponds to his specialized knowledge, allowing to provide a proper and timely evaluation of the work.

The reviewer must check for confirmation of compliance with the ethical norms of the research and inform the editor, if there are doubts about the ethical aspects of the

work.

The reviewer must inform the facts of plagiarism, to attract the attention of the editor in the

event of any significant similarity or overlap between the submitted manuscript and any

other known him personally published work.

The reviewer must assess the relevance (compliance with the current state of the art, compliance with the topic under consideration, etc.) of the given list of references.

The reviewer is obliged respect the confidentiality of peer review.

The reviewer should not involve anyone in the review of manuscript, including junior

researches, without obtaining permission of the journal's editorial board.

The reviewer does not have the opportunity to personally communicate with the author. Disputed issues are resolved exclusively by the journal's editorial board.

The reviewer should not use information obtained during the peer-review process in his own interests or in the interests of another person or organization.

The reviewer must be objective and constructive in their reviews, to express their views clearly, reasonably and correctly.

To write a review, the reviewer must use the form presented on the website.

The reviewer is obliged to check the corrections made by the author in accordance with the comments.