ANTI-MULLER'S HORMONE AS A PROGNOSTIC MARKER FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME IN DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21856/j-PEP.2026.1.04

Keywords:

anti-Мullerian hormone, polycystic ovary syndrome, hyperandrogenism, polycystic ovary morphology

Abstract

Background. Anti-Mullerian hormone is a peptide that is synthesized by granulosa cells of antral follicles and correlates with the number of follicles. The literature highlights the potential of using anti-Mullerian hormone for the detection and diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
The aim: to determine the concentration of anti-Mullerian hormone in the blood serum of individuals of different age groups to justify its use in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome.
Materials and methods. A retrospective cartographic analysis of 187 case histories of patients with PCOS aged 21-35 years in groups with an age range of 5 years was conducted. The main group consisted of patients (n = 93) with PCOS according to the Rotterdam criteria. The control group (n  =  94) consisted of relatively healthy women of appropriate age.
Laboratory data included determination of estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin, total testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, sex hormone-binding globulin, androstenedione, anti-Müllerian hormone, and thyroid-stimulating hormone levels. The LH/FSH ratio was calculated. Body mass index, Ferriman-Hollway score, and antral follicle count were assessed. Normally distributed data were compared using the t-test, while non-normally distributed data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Correlation analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. SPSS version 24 software was used.
Results. The rates of overt, ovulatory, normoandrogenic, and non-polycystic PCOS were 69.9 %, 10.8 %, 10.8 %, and 8.6 %, respectively. The Ferriman-Hollway score was significantly higher in PCOS patients than in controls. A significantly higher LH/FSH ratio was observed for all PCOS-groups. Serum concentrations of thyrotropin and prolactin were within the reference ranges for all patients. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations were higher in PCOS for each age group (P < 0.001), and the correlation between antral follicle count and serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels was strong (0.66 to 0.79, P < 0.001).
Conclusions. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration is a valuable parameter for evaluating patients with symptoms suggestive of polycystic ovary syndrome. The measurement of serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration to confirm the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome or the use of this parameter instead of assessing the number of antral follicles in determining the Rotterdam criteria is justified.

References

1. Abbott DH, Dumesic DA, Levine JE. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2019;14(2): 131-143. http://doi.org/10.1080/17446651.2019.1576522.

2. Kousta E, White DM, Johnston DG, Franks S. Open J Obstet Gynecol 2020;10(2). http://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.1020024.

3. Bell RJ, Islam RM, Skiba MA, et al. Hum Reprod 2021;37(1): 109-118. http://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab232.

4. Teede H, Misso M, Tassone EC, et al. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2019;30(7): 467-478. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2019.04.006.

5. Rao P, Bhide P. Ther Adv Reprod Heal 2020;14: 2633494120913032. http://doi.org/10.1177/2633494120913032.

6. Fu H, Lin Y, Deng X, et al. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2021;67(2): 112-120. Biol Reprod Med 2021;67(2): 112-120. http://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2020.1860155.

7. Elgun T, Karacan M, Sandal AI, et al. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2020;26(1): 25-30. http://doi.org/10.21613/GORM.2018.897.

8. Dietz de Loos A, Hund M, Buck K, et al. Fertil Steril 2021;116(4): 1149-1157. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.094/.

9. Abdelazim IA, Bekmukhambetov Y, Aringazina R, et al. J Fam Med Prim Care 2020;9(3): 1678. http://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1054_19.

10. Hyvlud A, Sabadash V, Gumnitsky J, Ripak N. Chem Chem Tech 2019;13(1): 95-100. http://doi.org/10.23939/chcht13.01.095.

11. Jensterle Sever M, Salamun V, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, et al. J Endocr Soc 2019;3(1): MON-220. http://doi.org/10.1210/js.2019-MON-220.

12. Ansari AM, Bhat KG, Dsa SS, et al. J Ped Hematol Oncol 2018;40(2): 128-131. http://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000001011.

13. Sorokman T, Makarova O, Ostapchuk V. Int J Endocrinol 2022;18(3): 163-168. http://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0721.18.3.2022.1164.

14. Kim van der Ham K, Laven JSE, Tay CT, et al. Fertil Steril 2024;122(4): 727-739. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.05.163.

15. Vale-Fernandes E, Pignatelli D, Monteiro MP. Eur J Endocrinol 2025; 192(4): R29-R43. http://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvaf062.

16. Gorzko A, Melnyk M, Nawrocka-Rutkowska J, et al. J Clin Med 2025;14(8): 2677. http://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082677.

17. Natsuki Miyake, Satoko Osuka, Isao Ohsawa, et al. Reprod Med Biol 2024;23(1): е12615. http://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12615.

18. Nasreen A. Osman. GREM 2024;5(2). http://doi.org/10.53260/grem.245021.

19. Mariane de Oliveira Gomes, Juliane de Oliveir Gomes, Lucas Fernandes Ananias, et al. AJOG 2025;232(6): 506-523. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.044.

20. Patrícia Jorge Schwenck de Carvalho, Giovana De Nardo Maffazioli, Ricardo Santos Simões, et al. MedRxiv 2025, available at: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.25.25321110v1.full.

21. Teede HJ, Tay CT, Laven JJE, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023;108(10): 2447-2469. http://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgad463.

22. Chang RJ, Dumesic DA. Yen and Jaffe’s Reprod Endocrinol 2019: 520-555.e13. http://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-47912-7.00021-4.

23. Sivanandy MS, Ha SK. Diagnostics 2023;13(5): 907. http://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050907.

24. Rudnicka E, Kunicki M, Calik-Ksepka A, et al. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(22). http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212507.

25. Higgins JPT, Morgan RL, Rooney AA, et al. Environ Int 2024;186(186): 108602. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108602.

26. Adamska A, Łebkowska A, Krentowska A, et al. Front Endocrinol 2020;11. http://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00440.

27. Albahlol IA, Neamatallah M, Serria MS, et al. BMC Medical Genomics 2023;16(1). http://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-023-01541-8.

28. Armstrong J, Cortes C, Hawkins K, Younis A. Gynecol Reprod Health 2022;6(5). http://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9342.1203.

29. Bahadur A, Verma N, Mundhra R, et al. Cureus 2021. http://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16047.

30. Carmina E, Lobo RA. Diagnostics 2022;12(10): 2313. http://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102313.

31. Mackens S, Drakopoulos P, Moeykens MF, et al. Reprod BioMed Online 2022;44(3): 565-571. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.009.

32. Huijgen NA, Laven JSE, Labee CT, et al. PLOS ONE 2015;10(11): e0142772. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142772.

33. Ibrahim IYM. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2022;16(1). http://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v16i1.17566.

34. Le NSV, Le MT, Nguyen ND, et al. Int J Women’s Health 2021;13: 793-801. http://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s329082.

35. Kaur J, Mahajan N. J Human Reprod Sci 2019;12(2): 104. http://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_149_18.

36. Malhotra N, Mahey R, Cheluvaraju R, et al. Reprod Sci 2023. http://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01195-y.

37. Mitra S, Saharia GK, Jena SK. Ann d’Endocrinol 2024;85(1): 44-47. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2023.06.001.

38. Ozay AC, Emekcı Ozay O, Gulekli B. Ginekologia Polska 2020;91(11): 661-667. http://doi.org/10.5603/gp.a2020.0122.

39. Asih D, None Ashon Sa’adi, None Budi Utomo, None Arif Tunjungseto. Bali Med J 2023;12(1): 861-865. http://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v12i1.4201.

40. Santhiya R, Syed Habeebullah, Ghose S. Sahel Med J 2021;24(1): 15-21. http://doi.org/10.4103/smj.smj_50_20.

41. Si M, Xu W, Qi X, et al. J Clin Med 2023;12(15): 5073-5073. http://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155073.

42. Sumji S, Bhat A, Rashid A, et al. Indian J Clin Biochem 2023;38: 457-465. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-022-01058-4.

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

Fartushok, T., Fartushok, N., Besedyn, O., & Isayeva, K. (2026). ANTI-MULLER’S HORMONE AS A PROGNOSTIC MARKER FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME IN DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS. Problems of Endocrine Pathology, 83(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.21856/j-PEP.2026.1.04

Issue

Section

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY