TRIGLYCERIDE-GLUCOSE INDEX AS NOVEL NONINVASIVE INDICATOR OF NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE DIAGNOSTICS IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21856/j-PEP.2025.1.03Keywords:
triglyceride-glucose index, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, logistic regression, ROC analysis, insulin resistanceAbstract
Background. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) can be considered as a predictor and one of the earliest and most specific pathogenetic markers of chronic noncommunicable diseases: type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and insulin resistance (IR). Triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index (TyG = ln[triglycerides (mmol/L) *18.018 *glycaemia(mmol/L)*18.018/2]) is a parameter by which insulin resistance can be assessed, since it is considered to be an indirect indicator of insulin resistance. The TyG index can be considered as an indicator for identifying individuals at risk for NAFLD, since elevated levels of the indicators that make up the index (fasting triglycerides and fasting blood glucose) are direct pathogenetic factors of NAFLD, as well as components of the metabolic syndrome.
The aim of the study was to determine the presence and nature of the relationship of a new indirect index of insulin resistance with the presence (or absence) of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes, as well as to determine the contribution of the TyG index to the risk of developing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Materials and methods. 61 patients with type 2 diabetes were examined (34/27 men/women; age 53±1.20 years; disease duration 13.36±3.49 years; of them – with NAFLD (n=24) without NAFLD (n=37); and 12 practically healthy individuals comparable in age and sex to the main group. Determination of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), triglycerides was performed by enzymatic method. Free fatty acids (FFA) were measured using a Wako Diagnostics kit (USA). According to the manufacturer's instructions for using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), levels of adipocytokines, such as adiponectin, leptin, progranulin and others, as well as insulin (DRG, Germany), were determined. IR was calculated using the HOMA-IR (Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance) insulin resistance index, which includes simultaneous determination of individual fasting serum insulin and glucose levels. Insulin sensitivity was determined by the QUICKI index (Quantitative Insulin Check Index). To assess the diagnostic properties of the TyG index, logistic regression analysis was used, including ROC analysis (receiver operation characteristic).
Results. The studied group (except for the control group) consisted exclusively of patients with type 2 diabetes with an insulin-resistant phenotype (body mass index: 32.68±0.77 kg/m2, HOMA-IR 8.04±0.77, QUICKI 0.46±0.007) with varying degrees of glycemic control (HbA1c =7.06±0.18). Patients with NAFLD are characterized by a higher TyG index (8.52±0.68) than the group without NAFLD (7.95±0.76; t=2.96; p=0.004), it was also found that the TyG index in patients with type 2 diabetes (8.17±0.78) was significantly higher than in the control group (7.07±0.49; t= 4.70; p=0.00001).
A significant correlation was found between the TyG index and a number of biochemical parameters: indicators of insulin resistance, lipid profile and oxidative stress, adipokines, and parameters of chronic inflammation, which clearly confirms the relationship between the TyG index and the pathogenesis of NAFLD.
Conclusions. The diagnostic model to form risk groups for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among patients with type 2 diabetes using logistic regression and ROC analysis was developed. The diagnostic criterion is a new indicator – triglyceride-glucose index, the threshold value of the predictor is defined as 8.018.
References
1. Elsayed AK, Vimalraj S, Nandakumar M, et al. World J Stem Cells 2021;13(3): 221-235. https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v13.i3.221
2. Alves-Bezerra M, Cohen DE. Compr Physiol 2017;8: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c170012
3. Dharmalingam M, Ganavi Yamasandhi P. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2018;22(3): 421-428. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_585_17
4. Dewidar B, KahlS, Pafili K, Roden M. Metab Clin Experim 2020;111: 154299 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154299
5. Wang J, Yan S, Cui Y. Nutrients 2022;14: 4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14234969
6. Sheng G, Lu S, Xie Q, et al. Lipids Health Dis 2021;20: 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-021-01561-2.
7. Ferro D, Baratta F. Pastori Nutrients 2020;12: 2762. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092762.
8. Lee KCh, Wu PSh, Lin HCh. Clin Mol Hepatol 2023;29: 77-98. https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2022.0237
9. Amzolini AM, Fortofoiu MC, Abu-Alhija AB, et al. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2021;62(2): 475-480. https://doi.org/10.47162/RJME.62.2.13
10. Kurniawan LB. EJIFCC 2024;35(1): 44-51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38706737/
11. Amzolini AM, Forofoiu MC, Alhija AB, et al. J Clin Med 2022;11: 3043. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113043
12. Simental-Mendia LE, Rodriguez-Moran M, Guerrero-Romero F. Metab Syndr Related Dis 2008;6: 299-304. https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2008.0034.
13. Wai-Sun W, Ekstedt G, Wong LH, et al. J Hepatol 2023;79: 842-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2023.04.036.
14. Tanase DM, Gosav EM, Costea CF, et al. J Diabetes Res 2020: 3920196. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3920196
15. Engin A. Adv Exp Med Biol 2017;960: 443-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48382-5_19.
16. Guo X, Yin X, Liu Z, Wang J. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(24): 15489. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415489.
17. Shabalala SC, Dludla PV, Mabasa L, et al. Biomed Pharmacother 2020;131: 110785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110785
18. Li W, Wang Y, He F, et al. BMC Endocrine Dis 2022;22: 261-267. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-01172-7
19. Zhang S, Du T, Zhang J, et al. Lipids Health Dis 2017;16: 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-017-0409-6
20. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, et al. Diabetologia 1985;28(7): 412-419, available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00280883
21. Katz A, Nambi SS, Mather K, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85(7): 2402-2410. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.8.2426
22. Fawcett T. Netherlands 2004: 1-38.
23. Hajian-Tilaki K. Caspian J Intern Med 2013;4(2): 627-635. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24009950/
24. Huanan C, Sangsang L, Amoah AN, et al. BMJ Open 2020;10(11): e039804. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039804.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Problems of Endocrine Pathology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN
ISSN 






